Posts Tagged ‘performance’

Three ways to increase video ad views

Monday, May 3rd, 2010
Graphical display of views/impressions ratio

Graphical display of views/impressions ratio

The data is in.

Video ad views result in a lift in branded search queries and visits to and time spent on advertisers’ websites.

That’s the conclusion of recent research studies by comScore, Microsoft, and others.

So it’s in any advertiser’s self interest to make sure that the online video ads they run attract as many views as possible.

Based on data that tracks hundreds of campaigns across numerous industry segments, here are 3 tips for increasing any video ad’s active view rate:

Use a compelling starting image

The starting image is the image that viewers see before they play a video ad. The more compelling that image, the more viewers the video ad attracts.

  • Video ads in the tourism and politics/advocacy segments with compelling starting images have attracted active view rates as high as 4.3 percent (compare to an industry benchmark view rate of 1.43 percent for tourism and 1.77 percent for politics/advocacy).

Beckon viewers with words

Include words on the starting image that make viewers an offer they can’t refuse. Or, ask viewers a question they can’t resist answering.

  • Video ads in the financial segment with compelling starting image text have attracted active view rates as high as 7.3 percent (compare to an industry benchmark view rate of 2.98 percent).
  • Video ads in the auto segment with compelling starting image text have attracted view rates of 3.38 percent (compare to an industry benchmark view rate of 2.54 percent).

Auto-optimize

The way to squeeze the best active view rate out of a video ad campaign is auto-optimization.

Auto-optimization means rotating different video ad versions through the same Player. After a specified number of impressions, the platform automatically runs the version with the best active view rate.

This gives advertisers the opportunity to effortlessly test different creative within the context of running a campaign. For example, an advertiser might compare the performance of:

  • Three versions with different starting images.
  • A version where the starting image includes an offer and a version where the starting image poses a question.

Auto-optimization not only helps advertisers improve video ad performance. It also gives them valuable information to carry forward into the design of subsequent campaigns.

When is a video ad campaign effective?

Monday, April 26th, 2010
Chart showing viewer engagement over the length of a video ad

Chart showing viewer engagement over the length of a video ad

As studies increasingly show (for example, see comScore’s Whither the Click in Europe?, this .Foxnet-comScore study, this VideoEgg-comScore study, and these reported results of a Nielsen IAG-Microsoft study), engaging video ads, even in the face of minimal clicks, effectively drive visits to advertisers’ websites and increase the number of trademark searches.

Given this data, click-through rate is not a terribly meaningful measure of an online video ad campaign’s success. But if not click-through, then what?

Here are some ways researchers are answering this question.

Dwell time

Using data sets from comScore and Eyeblaster, Microsoft found a “clear connection between the amount of time that a user spends actively engaging with an online ad and a consumer’s subsequent online behaviour with that brand.” Higher dwell scores mean more branded search queries and more visits to and engagement with the brand website.

Engagement mapping and view-through conversions

For several years, online marketers have been struggling with the disconnect between the knowledge that consumers visit multiple sites before conversion and metrics that focus on the last-seen or last-clicked ad.

For example, a study conducted by Microsoft’s Atlas Institute of advertising campaigns run by 250 advertisers across thousands of sites showed that most consumers make contact with advertisers months before they actually convert. Using a 90-day history window, consumers experienced a median of 18.5 ad events.

In response, Atlas introduced Engagement Mapping technology that allows advertisers to fold all types of events, including passive events such as views and impressions, into their ROI calculations.

Google recently announced view-through conversion reporting on the Google Content Network, which allows advertisers to tie conversions to display ad views within a 30-day window even when no clicks occur.

Engagement rate and conversion activity

In a June, 2009 benchmarks review, DoubleClick suggested that “the objective of rich media ads isn’t always to drive clicks.” Therefore, engagement metrics, such as interaction rates and times and video completion are important success measures.

In addition, DoubleClick argued, conversion activity can happen within an ad unit itself. For example, while watching a video ad, viewers might open and submit a lead capture form, take a poll, locate the nearest retail outlet, or play another video.

A wealth of data

In the Mixpo platform, you have access to a wealth of real-time data related to the performance of video ad campaigns. For example, you can:

  • See how much of your video ad viewers watch on average and what percentage of viewers watch the entire ad.
  • Track clicks, views, and interactions individually, or see an overall engagement rate that divides the total of all of these measures by the number of impressions to calculate an engagement percentage.
  • Track conversions, either by counting actions viewers take within a video ad or subsequent visits they make to the advertiser’s website.

How do you see it?

Let us know what you think. What results should advertisers expect from video ad campaigns? What metrics should they use to judge campaign effectiveness?

Optimization made easy

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

Way back in 2006, long before the Google acquisition, DoubleClick published a whitepaper called Best Practices for Optimizing Web Advertising Effectiveness.

The motivation for the paper was that, while online advertising was becoming mainstream, many advertisers were still not using proven strategies to improve ad effectiveness.

The first proven strategy the report lists for increasing online advertising effectiveness is setting clear campaign objectives and building optimization into the campaign process.

“Plan for campaigns to improve iteratively as you learn,” the report recommends, and adjust based on which ad creatives best achieve the defined objectives.

Four years later, online advertising is a good deal more mainstream. And, yet, probably because it’s perceived as difficult and expensive, many advertisers are still not building iterative optimization into their online advertising campaigns.

Designed to help video advertising campaigns succeed, the Mixpo platform removes barriers to optimization by allowing you to quickly and easily copy Xspots.

Copy Xspot window

Click Copy, name the versions, and you're done

After you click OK in the Copy this Xspot window, the new Xspot versions are immediately ready for editing. For example, you might experiment with different:

  • Starting images so you can test which image drives the most views.
  • Call to action language, so you can test which language drives the most viewers to your website.
  • Overlay actions, so you can test whether a lead capture form or an in-video printable coupon drives the most interactions.

Once the versions the advertiser wants to test are in place, you can rotate them through the same Player. After a specified number of impressions, the platform automatically drops the low performers.

More information

Mixpo account holders: Find instructions for copying Xspots and settings up auto-optimization by visiting the Client Resources page, and then searching for copy and auto-optimize.

Video ad exposure drives brand engagement

Monday, April 19th, 2010

A recent .Fox Networks and comScore study shows that exposure to video and display ads, even without clicks, increases consumer:

  • Visits to advertiser websites.
  • Searches for advertiser trademarks.

Compared to consumers exposed to display ads, consumers exposed to video ads were 28 percent more likely to visit brand sites and twice as likely to conduct trademark searches.

This study, which examined 4 2009 campaigns that delivered 300 million impressions to UK Internet users:

  • Proves the value of the video advertising format.
  • Demonstrates how important it is to measure campaign effectiveness using behavioral metrics that go beyond clicks.

Download a PDF about the Value of the Mixpo Xspot.

Synergy: TV + online more than sum of parts

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Double an ad campaign’s brand and message recall without spending any additional money? Sounds like a snake oil sales pitch.

As the recent Yahoo Advertising Blog post called A Smarter Mix of TV and Online demonstrates, however, it’s anything but.

From 2004 to 2009, TV viewership remained flat. During that same time period, Internet usage among North American households increased 117 percent. By taking advantage of these trends, advertisers can increase a campaign’s reach while lowering the cost of reaching target audiences.

Based on its analysis of Nielsen IAG data, Yahoo uses an auto maker promoting a new hybrid vehicle as an example. By devoting its entire $10 million advertising budget to a TV campaign, the auto maker could reach 68 percent of its target market. By shifting just 10 percent of the $10 million from TV to online, the same advertiser could reach 70 percent of potential buyers at a $3K+ lower cost per point (CPP).

No snake oil there. Just a strategic allocation that builds on the synergy between TV and online.

Read more or learn how easy it can be to extend your TV campaigns to the internet.

Run the best performing Xspot – automatically

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

“Video advertising is about performance, whether an advertiser measures it by awareness, traffic or converting site visitors to sales or leads.” So says Bill Todd in a post on the Online VideoInsider blog.

Political strategists know only too well that they have a limited window of opportunity to influence voters. Naturally, they want their online video advertising campaigns to perform as effectively as possible.

But how do strategists know what combination of creative and interactivity will actually deliver the best results? Typically, they have to guess.

Mixpo eliminates guesswork by making it easy to build optimization into the process of running an Xspot campaign.

Strategists can easily put together different versions of an Xspot to test which start frames attract the most viewers, which video content best holds viewers’ attention, or which calls to action and links to more detailed information deliver the most clicks.

The versions rotate randomly through the same Player. After a specified number of impressions, the Mixpo platform automatically replaces the rotating versions with the best performing Xspot.

Take a look at our Dynamic Video Advertising for Politics datasheet to see 2 versions of a 30-second TV spot customized to deliver 2 sets of campaign objectives.

Visit the product blog to read more about auto-optimization.

Monitor Xspot views by DMA

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Online video advertising is increasingly local. The Kelsey Group predicted that local online video ad revenue would reach $1.5 billion by 2012.

In an interview with Fred Aun of ClickZ, Matt Booth, SVP and program director for The Kelsey Group’s Interactive Local Media practice, explained the revenue growth this way: Local video ads are effective and result in action. Kelsey’s "User View" study found that 47.3 percent of the people who watched a local video ad visited the advertiser’s website.

In keeping with these predictions, large and small advertisers are jumping on the local video bandwagon. National advertisers are increasingly turning national campaigns local by geotargeting calls to action and contact information.

With this trend toward local advertising, advertisers need to know if their ads are reaching the intended audience. That’s why Mixpo recently supplemented the Viewer Locations map that we’ve always provided with a new analytics feature that allows advertisers to monitor Xspot performance by designated marketing area (DMA).

Viewer Locations map

Viewer Locations map we've always provided

By generating a custom Xspot report in the Dashboard, you can immediately see a list of the 210 U.S. DMAs arranged in descending order by the number of views that occurred in each.

Portion of DMA list in custom report

Portion of DMA list in custom report - Click for larger image

How DMA data can shape campaigns

Suppose a state agency is running a campaign for the local lottery. By examining the DMA view data (especially in combination with the Domain filter), the agency can tell how effectively publishers are delivering impressions to the target audience. Based on the data, the agency can modify its media plan or work with existing publishers to improve targeting.

Suppose a travel agency is running an Xspot campaign to promote discounted fares to the Caribbean. Based on click data from the DMA list, the agency can identify cities where the campaign generates the most activity. This gives the travel agency valuable insight into shaping future campaigns by directing impressions toward the most active markets.

More information

Mixpo subscribers can learn more about monitoring performance by DMA by visiting the Reports page, and then clicking Can I monitor Xspot views by DMA?

Track performance by domain

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

If you’re running campaigns across multiple publisher sites, as most advertisers and agencies do, you need data that helps you best optimize your media spend. It’s crucial to understand which publishers are giving you the best return on your CPM investment.

At Mixpo, we’re always refining our performance analytics to give you the data you need. Recently, we added a Domain filter to the Dashboard that allows you to compare impressions, views, clicks, exposure, viewer locations, and even Xspot placement across publishers.

Example: Compare Xspot Position maps

Suppose you’re seeing large differences in engagement rates between publisher sites. Xspot placement may explain it.

Compare the following Xspot Position maps. The first, for the publisher with a lower engagement rate, shows the Xspot running primarily below the fold. In contrast, the second map, for the publisher with a higher engagement rate, shows the Xspot running above the fold.

Xspot running primarily below the fold

Publisher 1: Xspot running primarily below the fold

Xspot running above the fold

Publisher 2: Xspot running above the fold

Example: Compare Viewer Location maps

Suppose you’re seeing loads of impressions for one publisher but few views or clicks. Another publisher has fewer impressions but a significantly higher views-to-impressions ratio. Audience targeting may explain it.

Compare the following two Viewer Location maps for an Xspot targeting a Montana audience. The top map suggests that the Xspot is being served to all viewers regardless of their locations, which results in a lot of wasted impressions. The bottom map suggests that the Xspot was better targeted at the appropriate local audience.

Xspot served to all viewers

Publisher 1: Xspot served to all viewers

Xspot served to viewers by location

Publisher 2: Xspot served to viewers by location

More performance analytics enhancements are on the way, including an analysis of performance data by designated marketing area (DMA). Check back soon for details.

More information

Mixpo subscribers can learn more about the Domain filter by visiting the Reports page, and then clicking Can I monitor Xspot performance by domain?